My book,
Biblical Eschatology, was recently cited and quoted from in a thread on
forums.carm.org concerning "Biblical Prophecies and Geography."
CARM stands for "Christian Apologetics and Research Ministry." On July 27 one contributor posted the following:
Here's an interpretation that I favor given the context of 'lightning' elsewhere in the NT.
According to
Biblical Eschatology by Jonathan Menn, 'lightning'
as used in both the OT and NT conveys the idea of divine judgment,
retribution, and warfare. The Hebrew word
brq refers to the theophanic (manifestation of God to people) presence of Yahweh.
W. Sibley Towner says "Lightning as a feature of the end of the age is
almost the only use made of the imagery in the NT (see Matt. 24:27; Luke
17:24 and esp. Rev. 4:5; 8:5; 11:19; 16:18), although the association
with theophany is also reutilized (Matt. 28:3)."
Jonathan Menn in his book
Biblical Eschatology goes on to say "Rev. 8:5; 11:19; 16:18 are particularly important in that the context there is judgment that accompanies the
parousia. Lightning as judgment is also used when Jesus speaks of Satan's fall in Luke 10:18."
Menn continues, "Finally, lightning as judgment is indicated by the fact
that lightning is associated with, if not identical to,
"fire from heaven"
which always indicates God's judgment: either his judgment on his
enemies, or his presence among his people and acceptance of their
sacrifices. Thus in the OT the eschatological judgment of the
"day of the Lord" is described in terms of fire. Likewise, in the NT the judgment that accompanies the
parousia is described in terms of fire."
I'm happy to see that, slowly by slowly, the book is getting exposure and is contributing to the ongoing discussion of biblical eschatology.